Nippy vs Smash
No size cap is nice. No countdown is nicer.
Smash’s free tier does something almost nobody else does: it accepts files of any size. The fine print is fair but real — transfers over 2 GB wait in a queue behind paying customers, and free links expire after 7 days (as of June 2026). That makes Smash the right pick for the occasional enormous hand-off where patience is cheap and the link only needs to survive the week.
Nippy is built for the opposite case: shares that are opened more than once, by more than one person, for longer than a week. Files become a page — photo folders turn into galleries with a lightbox and original-quality zip downloads, documents into tidy download pages, websites are hosted as-is — at an address that never expires and updates in place when files change. The free plan hosts one small site (25 MB); paid plans add gallery-sized space, passwords, custom domains and cookie-free analytics.
Put plainly: if the question is “how do I get this 30 GB file to one person this week?”, Smash. If it’s “how do I share this so people can come back to it?”, a transfer service is the wrong shape entirely.
Last reviewed: 12 June 2026
Side by side
The differences, at a glance.
| Nippy | Smash | |
|---|---|---|
| Free size | One site, 25 MB (paid plans add gallery space) | No hard cap — transfers over 2 GB are queued |
| Link lifetime | No expiry | 7 days on the free tier |
| Presentation | Galleries, file pages, hosted sites | A download page for the parcel |
| Updating a share | Same link, new files — publish in one click | New transfer, new link |
| Speed on big files | Not the tool for multi-gigabyte one-offs | Free queue for >2 GB; paid tiers skip it |
| Visitor analytics | Cookie-free, built in on paid plans | Download tracking on paid tiers |
Which one?
An honest fork in the road.
Choose Nippy when…
- People will open the link next month — galleries, portfolios, client pages
- The share should look like something: a gallery or tidy page, not a parcel
- You’ll revise the files and want one permanent link
Choose Smash when…
- You’re sending one enormous file and free-with-a-queue beats paying
- The link only needs to survive a few days
FAQ
Questions, answered.
Does Smash really have no size limit?
There’s no hard cap on free transfers, but anything over 2 GB waits in a queue behind paid users, and free links expire after 7 days (as of June 2026). For huge-but-patient one-offs it’s a genuinely good deal.
Which is better for delivering client photos?
A gallery link, in almost every case: clients browse thumbnails and a lightbox, download originals when they choose, and the link still works when they look for it months later. A transfer hands them a zip and a deadline.
Can I keep a Smash link alive longer?
Paid Smash tiers extend availability, but a transfer link always has a clock. If a share shouldn’t have one at all, host it instead — that’s the structural difference, not a plan upgrade.
Is Nippy a file-transfer service?
No — it’s hosting. Files live at a permanent address and are presented (as a gallery, a download page, or a website) rather than handed over once. The two tools complement rather than replace each other.
More questions? Visit the help center or email support@nippy.host
More comparisons
How Nippy stacks up elsewhere.
- vs WeTransfer
- vs Google Drive
- vs Tiiny.host
- vs Carrd
- vs Pixieset
- vs Weebly
- vs Google Photos
- vs SwissTransfer
- All comparisons →
Looking at the wider field? Best Smash alternatives
Weighing two other tools? Smash vs WeTransfer